[tdwg-tapir] log only terminology

John R. WIECZOREK tuco at berkeley.edu
Wed Aug 2 18:55:34 CEST 2006


I like Renato's suggestion as well.

On 8/2/06, "Döring, Markus" <m.doering at bgbm.org> wrote:
>
> that sounds best to me so far.
> yes, any other suggestion?
>
>
> -- Markus
>
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces at lists.tdwg.org
> > [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces at lists.tdwg.org] Im Auftrag von
> > Renato De Giovanni
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 14:38
> > An: tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> > Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology
> >
> > Markus,
> >
> > How about defining a controlled vocabulary?
> > <operations logRequests="[required | accepted | denied]">
> > --
> > Renato
> >
> > On 2 Aug 2006 at 11:23, "Döring, Markus" wrote:
> >
> > > hi,
> > > I am wondering about the naming for the attribute in the
> > capabilities that tells others if this provider wants to
> > receive log-only requests. How should we call it?
> > >
> > > <operations logRequestsDesired="true"> <operations
> > > logRequestsDenied="false"> <operations logRequests="true">
> > <operations
> > > logRequestsAccepted="true">
> > >
> > > >From those I would opt for "logRequestsDesired".
> > > Any preferences or different suggestions?
> > >
> > > regards
> > > -- Markus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tdwg-tapir mailing list
> > tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> > http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
> >
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-tapir mailing list
> tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-tag/attachments/20060802/177d8c5d/attachment.html 


More information about the tdwg-tag mailing list