AW: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology

["Döring, Markus"]

isnt it rather
"ahhh", "hmmm", "grrr"
?

-- Markus
  

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Javier privat 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 12:07
> An: Döring, Markus
> Cc: tuco at berkeley.edu; tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology
> 
> Or something like:
> 
> "ahhhh", "oh!" and "grrr"
> 
> :D
> 
> Javi
> 
> On 8/3/06, "Döring, Markus" <m.doering at bgbm.org> wrote:
> > well, maybe its more "desired" than required.
> > sure you cant enforce it. So its equivalent to I want it, I 
> dont care, I dont want.
> > How about those 3 terms? ;)
> >
> > -- Markus
> >
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Javier privat
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 19:07
> > > An: tuco at berkeley.edu
> > > Cc: Döring, Markus; tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> > > Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology
> > >
> > > Is it "requiered" what I understand?
> > >
> > > I mean... how do you want to enforce this? If there is no way to 
> > > enforce it why dont just use accepted/denied? Or even
> > > better: true, false
> > >
> > > Cheers.
> > >
> > > On 8/2/06, John R. WIECZOREK <tuco at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > > > I like Renato's suggestion as well.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 8/2/06, "Döring, Markus" <m.doering at bgbm.org> wrote:
> > > > > that sounds best to me so far.
> > > > > yes, any other suggestion?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Markus
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > > Von: tdwg-tapir-bounces at lists.tdwg.org 
> > > > > > [mailto:tdwg-tapir-bounces at lists.tdwg.org ] Im Auftrag
> > > > von
> > > > > > Renato De Giovanni
> > > > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 14:38
> > > > > > An: tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [tdwg-tapir] log only terminology
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Markus,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How about defining a controlled vocabulary?
> > > > > > <operations logRequests="[required | accepted | denied]">
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Renato
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2 Aug 2006 at 11:23, "Döring, Markus" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > hi,
> > > > > > > I am wondering about the naming for the attribute in the
> > > > > > capabilities that tells others if this provider wants
> > > to receive
> > > > > > log-only requests. How should we call it?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <operations logRequestsDesired="true"> <operations 
> > > > > > > logRequestsDenied="false"> <operations logRequests="true">
> > > > > > <operations
> > > > > > > logRequestsAccepted="true">
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >From those I would opt for "logRequestsDesired".
> > > > > > > Any preferences or different suggestions?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards
> > > > > > > -- Markus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > tdwg-tapir mailing list
> > > > > > tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> > > > > > http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > tdwg-tapir mailing list
> > > > > tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> > > > > http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > tdwg-tapir mailing list
> > > > tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> > > > http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>