[tdwg-tapir] Concept mappings

[Javier de la Torre]

Yes, we tried and it works.

Thats the reason why we had to adapt for multiple namespaces some time ago.

But you can not specify the typical GML app schema, I had to do the
same as with RDF, you have to create a fake schema that simulates it.
But we learnt some time ago that this legal :)

Also consider that being able to produce a valid GML app schema as
output doesnt mean TAPIR has WFS support!

But is a good begining :)

Cheers.

On 8/3/06, Roger Hyam <roger at tdwg.org> wrote:
> Hi Tapir Guys,
>
> One quick question: Will TAPIR be able to produce valid GML as an output
> model. i.e. if I specify a simple GML application schema as a output
> model should it work? Has anyone done this?
>
> I presume that if it works as an output model I can also use it as a
> conceptual schema and just ask for the default mappings.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roger
>
> --
>
> -------------------------------------
>  Roger Hyam
>  Technical Architect
>  Taxonomic Databases Working Group
> -------------------------------------
>  http://www.tdwg.org
>  roger at tdwg.org
>  +44 1578 722782
> -------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-tapir mailing list
> tdwg-tapir at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-tapir
>