<div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <<a href="mailto:tdwg-content-owner@lists.tdwg.org">tdwg-content-owner@lists.tdwg.org</a>><br>Date: 15 Jan 2014 07:56<br>Subject: Environmentally related information<br>
To: <<a href="mailto:ap16709@gmail.com">ap16709@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: <br><br type="attribution">You need to be subscribed to this mailing list in order to post<br>
messages<br>
<br>
<br><br>---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------<br>From: Annett P <<a href="mailto:ap16709@gmail.com">ap16709@gmail.com</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org">tdwg-content@lists.tdwg.org</a><br>
Cc: <br>Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:56:40 +0100<br>Subject: Environmentally related information<br><p dir="ltr">I was wondering whether it has been attempted/it is feasible to use the standards of observations and measurements (<a href="http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/om" target="_blank">http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/om</a>) to describe sampling procedure and environmental context of a species instead of extending DwC with terms? Any hint is very much appreciated.<br>
Best regards<br>
Annett</p>
<br></div>