It isn't duplicated - it's just suggested for re-use.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Gregor Hagedorn <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:g.m.hagedorn@gmail.com">g.m.hagedorn@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">>> Although these three terms are in the DCMI type vocabulary, the DCMI<br>
>> type vocabulary does not provide the controlled values for<br>
>> basisOfRecord, so they need to be in the DwC type vocabulary.<br>
<br>
</div>Question to an RDF-expert: Is this a technical limitation? I don't<br>
fully grasp why here a vocabulary needs to duplicated (the entire<br>
dcmi-type vocabulary is a potential vocabulary for basis of record,<br>
not just three items).<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Gregor<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>