<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7654.12">
<TITLE>Re: [tdwg-content] canonical name for named hybrid & infragenericnames [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Van: Paul Murray [<A HREF="mailto:pmurray@anbg.gov.au">mailto:pmurray@anbg.gov.au</A>]<BR>
Verzonden: vr 10-12-2010 3:25<BR>
<BR>
> I have just been running through some code in APNI dealing<BR>
> with just this issue.<BR>
<BR>
***<BR>
The ICBN-way to deal with these are:<BR>
<BR>
* A generic name may be marked as a hybrid. It is rendered<BR>
×Foo<BR>
or<BR>
nothogenus Foo<BR>
<BR>
* An infrageneric name may be marked as a hybrid. It is rendered<BR>
$genericName rank ×Foz<BR>
or<BR>
$genericName nothorank Foz<BR>
<BR>
* A species name may be marked as a hybrid. It is rendered<BR>
$genericName ×bar<BR>
or<BR>
nothospecies $genericName bar<BR>
<BR>
* An infraspecific name may be marked as a hybrid. It is rendered<BR>
$genericName bar rank ×baz<BR>
or<BR>
$genericName bar nothorank baz<BR>
<BR>
The following do not concern hybrid names or names in the sense<BR>
of the ICBN at all:<BR>
hybrid_code 'I' --> foo - bar (intergrade)<BR>
hybrid_code '+' --> foo + bar (graft)<BR>
hybrid_code 'U' --> foo hybrid (unspecified hybrid?)<BR>
<BR>
However, the ICNCP uses<BR>
+Foo<BR>
and<BR>
Foo +bar<BR>
but not<BR>
+Foo bar<BR>
<BR>
Paul van Rijckevorsel<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>