[tdwg-content] Darwin Core Proposal - term content recommendations to comments
Paul J. Morris
mole at morris.net
Thu Feb 5 18:46:33 CET 2015
Yes.
iao brings in a number of imports with significant implications and a
particular high level view of the world.
-Paul
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:21:33 -0300
John Wieczorek <tuco at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Does anyone have similar concerns about iao:example?
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Paul J. Morris <mole at morris.net>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:17:58 -0500
> > Bob Morris <morris.bob at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > But skos:note and its subproperties (including skos:example) can
> > > take literals or references [1]. To me, that weighs more than
> > > the baggage of minting two new terms.
> >
> > Also, SKOS, unless care is taken to import the Owl-DL version,
> > brings you into Owl-Full, with undesirable consequences for those
> > who wish to do reasoning. In early versions of dwcFP, we did
> > include SKOS terms, but removed them because of the consequences
> > for reasoning.
> >
> > SKOS has some nice terms, reuse is a nice idea, but it comes with
> > significant knowledge engineering consequences.
> >
> > -Paul
> > --
> > Paul J. Morris
> > Biodiversity Informatics Manager
> > Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy
> > mole at morris.net AA3SD PGP public key available
> > _______________________________________________
> > tdwg-content mailing list
> > tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> > http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
> >
--
Paul J. Morris
Biodiversity Informatics Manager
Harvard University Herbaria/Museum of Comparative Zoölogy
mole at morris.net AA3SD PGP public key available
More information about the tdwg-content
mailing list