[tdwg-content] DwC for the semantic web
steve.baskauf at vanderbilt.edu
Wed May 4 22:10:28 CEST 2011
Well, I wouldn't be opposed to that, particularly since the class
currently called dsw:IndividualOrganism isn't really the same thing as
the proposed dwc:Individual class is defined anyway.
Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
>>> As a point of clarification, the class dsw:IndividualOrganism as we
>>> have defined it in DSW
>>> does not specify that an instance of the class must actually be an
>>> individual organism [...] At one point we considered using the name
>>> TaxonomicallyHomogeneousEntity, but that seemed unwieldy.
>> If that's what it is, then that's what it should be called, in my
> I would completely echo this. Although in some ways the label of a
> class is arbitrary and what counts is the definition, we communicate
> meaning through language, and thus how you name something matters.
> Perhaps we can just try to pool ideas for a better name and see what
> comes up?
Steven J. Baskauf, Ph.D., Senior Lecturer
Vanderbilt University Dept. of Biological Sciences
postal mail address:
VU Station B 351634
Nashville, TN 37235-1634, U.S.A.
2125 Stevenson Center
1161 21st Ave., S.
Nashville, TN 37235
office: 2128 Stevenson Center
phone: (615) 343-4582, fax: (615) 343-6707
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tdwg-content