[tdwg-content] data provenance; was Re: Updated TDWG BioBlitz RDF Example with Pivot View and Data Browsing [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Paul Murray pmurray at anbg.gov.au
Wed Mar 2 02:40:36 CET 2011


On 27/02/2011, at 6:01 AM, Bob Morris wrote:

>   "Note: The number of digits of the values in <coordinates> MUST NOT be interpreted as an indication to the level of uncertainty."  The section following is also interesting, albeit irrelevant for your procedure. It implies that when uncertainty is omitted (and therefore unknown), then "geo:41.53000000,-70.67000000"  and "geo:41.53,-70.67"  identify  the same geo resource.

This follows from the definition of xs:float, which RDF (and presumably geo) borrow. These two strings are each representations of the same IEEE floating-point value. Something with a precision is a different datatype.

It seems to me that georeferencing needs a notion of density - some way to express a location as a value at a point and a standard deviation (we assume a normal distribution). A rectangle becomes an integral of these densities at each point - standard deviation of zero corresponding to the usual sharply-defined rectangle. You'd probably also want to supply a cutoff value. 

_______________________________________________


If you have received this transmission in error please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. If this e-mail or any attachments have been sent to you in error, that error does not constitute waiver of any confidentiality, privilege or copyright in respect of information in the e-mail or attachments.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/attachments/20110302/1ec5cd45/attachment.html 


More information about the tdwg-content mailing list