[tdwg-content] More Strange Monkey Business-like things in GBIF KOS Document
Peter DeVries
pete.devries at gmail.com
Fri Feb 11 23:24:29 CET 2011
More Strange Monkey Business-like things in GBIF KOS Document.
Does this accurately characterize my project?
"in the GeoSpecies project104 based on a small purpose-built ontology105 of
mosquito-borne human pathogens."
Did they bother to read any of the seven other examples on this page?
Or here http://www.taxonconcept.org/
or here
http://www.delicious.com/kidehen/pivot_collection_app+linked_geo_species
or here
http://www.slideshare.net/pjdwi/biodiversity-informatics-on-the-semantic-web
Also note that this particular link they used in the document 104 does not
work
http://about.geospecies.org/index.htm
While this
http://about.geospecies.org/
or this does
http://about.geospecies.org/index.html
Also the "small" TaxonConcept SPARQL endpoint has ~27 million triples.
It might also be useful to explain how reasoning can be used on the larger
data sets.
Do they have an example of reasoning that works on a data set over 100
million triples?
Is there some reason why there is so much "push" towards specialized near
proprietary solutions like LSID's and LOD unfriendly vocabularies?
Respectfully,
- Pete
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Pete DeVries
Department of Entomology
University of Wisconsin - Madison
445 Russell Laboratories
1630 Linden Drive
Madison, WI 53706
TaxonConcept Knowledge Base <http://www.taxonconcept.org/> / GeoSpecies
Knowledge Base <http://lod.geospecies.org/>
About the GeoSpecies Knowledge Base <http://about.geospecies.org/>
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/attachments/20110211/aeedde0f/attachment.html
More information about the tdwg-content
mailing list