[tdwg-content] What RDF is (Was Re: Idea for Discussion, Differentiating between "type's" of identifiers)

[Blum, Stan]

TDWG-TAG was not to be decommissioned.

If this discussion on TDWG-Content is not being archived (as Alrin noticed), then there was a glitch in the reconfiguration.  I think (hope) Markus can look into that tomorrow.

Addressing Markus’ earlier question, I don’t think this is boring to people interested in TDWG-Content.  It will just need to be explained and/or summarized to those not fully aware of the technical issues, particularly if we reach a consensus.  A regular restatement of the choices and issues helps to keep people focused.

-Stan




On 10/6/10 11:52 AM, "Peter DeVries" <pete.devries at gmail.com> wrote:

I think the tdwg-tag list was shutdown as part of a effort to condense the tdwg lists to those that had traffic?

- Pete

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Markus Döring <m.doering at mac.com> wrote:
I am wondering if this discussion and similar rdf, lsid topics should continue on tdwg-tag rather than tdwg-content.
We might bore quite a few people...

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/attachments/20101006/e01a50bc/attachment.html