[tdwg-content] [tdwg-tag] Inclusion of authorship in DwC scientificName: good or bad?

Dmitry Mozzherin dmozzherin at eol.org
Fri Nov 19 01:55:28 CET 2010


If there is a way to make approach b) to be fool proof and make sure
everyone is following it, it would be fine for the purpose of
conversion DwCA file to something eise. However in practice usually if
I see scientificName and scientificNameAuthorhips in core file --
scientificName contains only canonical name.

Dima

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Markus Döring <m.doering at mac.com> wrote:
> Sorry if I wasnt clear, but definitely b)
> Not all names can be easily reassembled with just the atoms. Autonyms need a bit of caution, hybrid formulas surely wont fit into the atoms and things like Inula L. (s.str.) or Valeriana officinalis s. str. wont be possible either. dwc:scientificName should be the most complete representation of the full name. The (redundant) atomised parts are a recommended nice to have to avoid any name parsing.
>
> As a consumer this leads to trouble as there is no guarantee that all terms exist. But the same problem exists with all of the ID terms and their verbatim counterpart. Only additional best practice guidelines can make sure we have the most important terms such as taxonRank or taxonomicStatus available.
>
> Markus
>
>
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 23:26, Tony.Rees at csiro.au wrote:
>
>> Just re-sending the message below because it bounced the first time…
>>
>>
>> Markus/all,
>>
>> I guess my point is that (as I understand it) scientificName is a required field in DwC, so the question is what it should be populated with. If it is (e.g.) genus + species epithet + authority, then is it beneficial to supply these fields individually / atomised as well, maybe with other qualifiers as needed?
>>
>> Just looking for an example "best practice" here - or maybe it exists somewhere and you can just point to it.
>> in other words:
>>
>> (a)
>> <scientificName>Homo sapiens</scientificName>
>> <scientificNameAuthorship>Linnaeus, 1758</a>
>>
>> or (b):
>> <scientificName>Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758</scientificName>
>> <genus>Homo</genus>
>> <specificEpithet>sapiens</specificEpithet>
>> <scientificNameAuthorship>Linnaeus, 1758</a>
>>
>> if you get my drift...
>>
>> Regards  - Tony
>>
>> Tony Rees
>> Manager, Divisional Data Centre,
>> CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research,
>> GPO Box 1538,
>> Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
>> Ph: 0362 325318 (Int: +61 362 325318)
>> Fax: 0362 325000 (Int: +61 362 325000)
>> e-mail: Tony.Rees at csiro.au
>> Manager, OBIS Australia regional node, http://www.obis.org.au/
>> Biodiversity informatics research activities: http://www.cmar.csiro.au/datacentre/biodiversity.htm
>> Personal info: http://www.fishbase.org/collaborators/collaboratorsummary.cfm?id=1566
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tdwg-content mailing list
>> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
>> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
>
> _______________________________________________
> tdwg-content mailing list
> tdwg-content at lists.tdwg.org
> http://lists.tdwg.org/mailman/listinfo/tdwg-content
>


More information about the tdwg-content mailing list