Trying it out
Susan B. Farmer
sfarmer at GOLDSWORD.COM
Fri Aug 11 09:35:12 CEST 2000
>> > Treatment build/revision number is a really good idea and we all agreed
>> > that we should have had it in our treatments before.
>> > <TREATMENT REVISION>0.1</TREATMENT REVISION>
>> > We use the 0 when the treatment is under development and not released yet.
>> > I do not know how to deal with dynamic treatment build revision numbers.
>>What's meant by this?
>I don't think this needs to be in the spec. We're just following software
>development practice that anything with a revision number less than 1.0 can
>not be trusted.... Or is that anything less than 2.5?
IME, anything less than 1.0 -- and *nothing* that ends in a 0 even if
it is 5.0 ...wait till 5.1!
sfarmer at goldsword.com
Botany Department, University of Tennessee
More information about the tdwg-content